I was infuriated by the actions of the railway company SouthEastern and London Underground this morning, which added to the aggravation caused by the weather.
Due to an accident (I assume) Stafford Road between Wallington and the A23 was gridlocked, so my usual bus into Croydon was not likely to run any time soon.
I trudged through the snow to the nearest railway station and did manage to catch a train into London Bridge. It took nearly twice as long as normal, and when we arrived, London Bridge station was very congested. The Underground station entrance had been closed "due to overcrowding" (due to lack of trains I think). Everyone went to Platform 6 to try to get on a service to Charing Cross or Waterloo.
Several trains came and went, too full to take more than a few passengers. Then a half-empty one came in and stopped but the doors did not open. Eventually an announcement was made that this train was not due to stop at this station. But since it had stopped anyway at a red light, why didn't they open the doors and clear some of the backlog of frustrated passengers?
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
Making Life Hell?
A friend, who I think is a Moslem, sent me the attached "quick and dirty" translation of an article in Milliyet by Semih I'diz. He asked for his name not to be published. My response is shown below.
They are Making Life Hell for Moslems
Semih I˙diz sidiz@milliyet.com.tr
Monday, 4 January 2010
First, a Nigerian madman called Ömer Faruk Abdulmuttalib is caught while trying to blow up an American passenger plane. After that, a young man from Somalia, whose name was not disclosed, tries to kill the danish cartoonist Kurt W Estergaard, who caused indignation in the moslem world with his Mohammed cartoons.
Then, life becomes unbearable again for the moslems in the west. There are increased signs that this is not a transitional but a permanent condition. The congregation leaders of millions of moslems living in the west remain spectators while their living space shrinks.
Basic reason is "cultural differences". The aforementioned congregation leaders cannot bring themselves to demonstrate the condemning stance that would satisfy the western public, although they live in the west and share the benefits of doing so.
They limit their reactions to a few "politically required" public statements. When they try to explain the situation by referring to Israel or to the US invasion of Iraq, they only increase the indignation felt against moslems.
We are talking about the psychology of the western society within which millions of moslems are living. The fact that people walking on the streets in the west are killed in the name of Islam cancels out the "explanatory arguments" of the moslem congregation leaders.
Under these circumstances, the "man on the street" in the west, who is not very sophisticated to start with, cannot see the difference between the few madmen misusing religion and the millions of moslems going after their business and who want to live without upsetting anyone.
To summarise, one cannot explain to a Dutch person the killling of Theo Van Gogh in the name of Islam, irrespective of what an unpleasant person he was. One cannot explain the knife-and-axe attack on Westergaard while he was sitting at home with his grandson, even if he was beginning to show extreme right-wing tendencies.
In the meanwhile, we can also see that the aggressive madmen we mentioned are providing the opportunity to the extreme Right in the west for developing its anti-moslem arguments. Indeed, after the attack on Westergaard, calls of "Throw out the moslems that do not adhere to our laws and customs" have immediately started in Denmark.
One also needs to see the minaret referendum in Switzerland in the same framework. Actually, Switzerland is one of the countries in Europe with the least of issues with its moslem minority. In spite of this, the terror being carried out in the world in the name of Islam has caused even the Swiss public to take an anti-moslem stance.
A study carried out recently by the "European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights" disclosed the negative developments in Europe regarding moslems. According to this study, if you are a moslem or you "look like a moslem", your chances of finding a job, moving to certain neighbourhoods or even moving freely within society is becoming increasingly difficult.
Some even see the plans for installing "naked body" scanners in European airports as a result of the attack of the Nigerian madman in the same framework. After a certain point, being naked is not such an issue for a western person. There will be many who will say "I accept it for security".
The situation among moslems is totally different due to the understanding of privacy as well as religious and cultural values. The covering up of women already shows the sensitivity there. According to some voices, once this equipment is in operation, moslems will give up travelling to the west or travelling outside the countries they live in the west.
Thus, the factors of security and control will increase. Those who do not accept these factors will "return to where they came from and remain there". This is the largest consequence from the deeds of the 9/11 criminals, the madmen from Somalia and Nigeria.
They do not contribute to improving the living conditions of moslems in the Gaza Strip or Iraq. Just the opposite, either consciously or intentionally, they play into the hands of the extreme-rightists in Europe, such as Geert Wilders.
To put it in a nutshell, they bring about the conditions for making life hell for moslems in the west.
Hi xxxxx,
Thanks for the article. Thought-provoking reading first thing in the morning! I will think carefully about forwarding it. I think that particularly the point about the full-body scanners at airports (and major rail stations as well, quite possibly - did you know about that?) is well made. I hadn't previously considered their likely impact on members of certain religions, though I don't feel particularly comfortable myself even being "patted down" and wouldn't relish the thought of effectively being inspected without my clothes on.
It isn't only Moslems who are being impacted by the extra "security" measures. They make life more expensive and less convenient for everyone, though possibly to a greater degree for members of certain races and religious minorities in the West. In some ways, this plays into the hands of the extremists. During WWII, the British public was determined not to let the enemy destroy their way of life, so beyond taking a few precautions such as a blackout against bombers, and evacuating children from the big cities, they cheerfully carried on regardless of the war. I think it's time to rediscover that resolve to live proudly according to the values we believe in, keep our eyes and ears open, and take a few risks for the sake of a well-balanced society.
Lutheran theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer wisely warned (in 1934!) that safety and security are mutually exclusive. What he meant was that if nation states entered a race to build up their defences in the name of peace, they would endanger everyone by exposing them to a greater risk of war - and how right he was. We are facing a similar situation today. There is a global threat to civilised society from some sadly deluded religious fanatics. Those who think that the threat can be averted by military means are similarly deluded and similarly threaten civil liberties. Another way must be found. For almost 30 years, the United Kingdom faced fanatical Irish nationalists who were prepared to sacrifice innocent lives on a massive scale to pursue their political ends. It was only when we abandoned our entrenched positions and began to negotiate that an accommodation became possible. It even turned out that at least some of the nationalists were not such odious individuals after all.
Instead of expending prodigious resources in the "war on terror", we should all be pulling together to face common threats, such as climate change and mass extinction of rare species. Also see this story. Let's hope that the world can come to its senses in the nick of time, as it usually seems to manage. Is that a hopeful message with which to begin the year 2010?
Best regards,
Immo.
They are Making Life Hell for Moslems
Semih I˙diz sidiz@milliyet.com.tr
Monday, 4 January 2010
First, a Nigerian madman called Ömer Faruk Abdulmuttalib is caught while trying to blow up an American passenger plane. After that, a young man from Somalia, whose name was not disclosed, tries to kill the danish cartoonist Kurt W Estergaard, who caused indignation in the moslem world with his Mohammed cartoons.
Then, life becomes unbearable again for the moslems in the west. There are increased signs that this is not a transitional but a permanent condition. The congregation leaders of millions of moslems living in the west remain spectators while their living space shrinks.
Basic reason is "cultural differences". The aforementioned congregation leaders cannot bring themselves to demonstrate the condemning stance that would satisfy the western public, although they live in the west and share the benefits of doing so.
They limit their reactions to a few "politically required" public statements. When they try to explain the situation by referring to Israel or to the US invasion of Iraq, they only increase the indignation felt against moslems.
We are talking about the psychology of the western society within which millions of moslems are living. The fact that people walking on the streets in the west are killed in the name of Islam cancels out the "explanatory arguments" of the moslem congregation leaders.
Under these circumstances, the "man on the street" in the west, who is not very sophisticated to start with, cannot see the difference between the few madmen misusing religion and the millions of moslems going after their business and who want to live without upsetting anyone.
To summarise, one cannot explain to a Dutch person the killling of Theo Van Gogh in the name of Islam, irrespective of what an unpleasant person he was. One cannot explain the knife-and-axe attack on Westergaard while he was sitting at home with his grandson, even if he was beginning to show extreme right-wing tendencies.
In the meanwhile, we can also see that the aggressive madmen we mentioned are providing the opportunity to the extreme Right in the west for developing its anti-moslem arguments. Indeed, after the attack on Westergaard, calls of "Throw out the moslems that do not adhere to our laws and customs" have immediately started in Denmark.
One also needs to see the minaret referendum in Switzerland in the same framework. Actually, Switzerland is one of the countries in Europe with the least of issues with its moslem minority. In spite of this, the terror being carried out in the world in the name of Islam has caused even the Swiss public to take an anti-moslem stance.
A study carried out recently by the "European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights" disclosed the negative developments in Europe regarding moslems. According to this study, if you are a moslem or you "look like a moslem", your chances of finding a job, moving to certain neighbourhoods or even moving freely within society is becoming increasingly difficult.
Some even see the plans for installing "naked body" scanners in European airports as a result of the attack of the Nigerian madman in the same framework. After a certain point, being naked is not such an issue for a western person. There will be many who will say "I accept it for security".
The situation among moslems is totally different due to the understanding of privacy as well as religious and cultural values. The covering up of women already shows the sensitivity there. According to some voices, once this equipment is in operation, moslems will give up travelling to the west or travelling outside the countries they live in the west.
Thus, the factors of security and control will increase. Those who do not accept these factors will "return to where they came from and remain there". This is the largest consequence from the deeds of the 9/11 criminals, the madmen from Somalia and Nigeria.
They do not contribute to improving the living conditions of moslems in the Gaza Strip or Iraq. Just the opposite, either consciously or intentionally, they play into the hands of the extreme-rightists in Europe, such as Geert Wilders.
To put it in a nutshell, they bring about the conditions for making life hell for moslems in the west.
Hi xxxxx,
Thanks for the article. Thought-provoking reading first thing in the morning! I will think carefully about forwarding it. I think that particularly the point about the full-body scanners at airports (and major rail stations as well, quite possibly - did you know about that?) is well made. I hadn't previously considered their likely impact on members of certain religions, though I don't feel particularly comfortable myself even being "patted down" and wouldn't relish the thought of effectively being inspected without my clothes on.
It isn't only Moslems who are being impacted by the extra "security" measures. They make life more expensive and less convenient for everyone, though possibly to a greater degree for members of certain races and religious minorities in the West. In some ways, this plays into the hands of the extremists. During WWII, the British public was determined not to let the enemy destroy their way of life, so beyond taking a few precautions such as a blackout against bombers, and evacuating children from the big cities, they cheerfully carried on regardless of the war. I think it's time to rediscover that resolve to live proudly according to the values we believe in, keep our eyes and ears open, and take a few risks for the sake of a well-balanced society.
Lutheran theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer wisely warned (in 1934!) that safety and security are mutually exclusive. What he meant was that if nation states entered a race to build up their defences in the name of peace, they would endanger everyone by exposing them to a greater risk of war - and how right he was. We are facing a similar situation today. There is a global threat to civilised society from some sadly deluded religious fanatics. Those who think that the threat can be averted by military means are similarly deluded and similarly threaten civil liberties. Another way must be found. For almost 30 years, the United Kingdom faced fanatical Irish nationalists who were prepared to sacrifice innocent lives on a massive scale to pursue their political ends. It was only when we abandoned our entrenched positions and began to negotiate that an accommodation became possible. It even turned out that at least some of the nationalists were not such odious individuals after all.
Instead of expending prodigious resources in the "war on terror", we should all be pulling together to face common threats, such as climate change and mass extinction of rare species. Also see this story. Let's hope that the world can come to its senses in the nick of time, as it usually seems to manage. Is that a hopeful message with which to begin the year 2010?
Best regards,
Immo.
Software Engineering Best Practices
Tom Gilb recommends Capers Jones's latest book Software Engineering Best Practices. From my quick reading of the preface and introduction, it certainly looks like a thorough piece of work!
Saturday, 5 September 2009
Another space tourist - so what?
I've just read about Guy Laliberté's Poetic Social Mission for the One Drop Foundation. The seventh private space traveller is doing more with his once-in-a-lifetime opportunity than just enjoying himself - he plans to stage a worldwide music and arts event involving himself aboard the ISS, to draw attention to the worldwide need for fair and equitable access to water.
The guest list sounds brilliant (Peter Gabriel, U2, Shakira and many others) - the downside is that the two-hour spectacular is due to kick off at 8pm Eastern on October 9th, which makes it about 1am in our time zone. I think it's being broadcast via YouTube, so perhaps we'll be able to watch it later on? Details about this are a bit sketchy at the moment - the site just says "broadcast right here".
The guest list sounds brilliant (Peter Gabriel, U2, Shakira and many others) - the downside is that the two-hour spectacular is due to kick off at 8pm Eastern on October 9th, which makes it about 1am in our time zone. I think it's being broadcast via YouTube, so perhaps we'll be able to watch it later on? Details about this are a bit sketchy at the moment - the site just says "broadcast right here".
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
Save Bletchley Park with Boffoonery!
The title says it all really.
Jason Gorman has managed to get some amazing events off the ground in the past couple of years and this one should be absolutely excellent. It's called Boffoonery! ("buffoonery for boffins") - a once-only comedy benefit gig to raise money for the extremely important wartime heritage site (Station X) and unique computing museum that is Bletchley Park near Milton Keynes.
Jason's partners in crime are comedy writer James Cary, whose credits include hit TV comedies like My Hero and My Family and who also writes the cult BBC Radio 4 sitcom Hut 33, which is set at Bletchley Park, and veteran TV and radio comedy producer David Tyler.
The show is still taking shape, but Jason is delighted to be able to confirm that Robert Llewellyn (Red Dwarf), Richard Herring (Fist Of Fun, This Morning With Richard Not Judy) and cerebral stand-up Robin Ince are on the bill. More big name comedians and comedy writers are TBA, so keep en eye out for updates.
The best way we can support Bletchley Park is to send a message to government and funding bodies about how much we care. If the show were to sell out, and sell out quickly, that would send a very clear message indeed.
And since you ask - yes, you can help. Tickets go on sale on Wednesday Aug 12th at 9am. Please help to spread the word and create a splash on Wednesday. Here are some of the ways you can help:
- Buy your tickets on Aug 12th
- Tell your friends and colleagues about Boffoonery!, and encourage them to buy their tickets on Aug 12th
- Print off copies of the show's A4 poster, which you can download from www.boffoonery.com, and stick them up on your noticeboards at work
- Blog about Boffoonery, and pass on these suggestions about how people can help save Bletchley Park
- If you're a Twitter user, on the morning of Aug 12th send a tweet about #boffoonery and www.boffoonery.com, and RT any #boffoonery tweets that cross your path
It's going to be brilliant evening, and your kindness and generosity will ensure that generations to come will be able to see and experience the achievements of those brilliant boffins whose ingenuity saved 22 million lives and ushered in the information age.
You can find out more by visiting www.boffoonery.com, or following #boffoonery on Twitter or "boffoonery" on Facebook.
A pity there isn't a theatre big enough in Bletchley Park itself to host this event! That said, the Bloomsbury Theatre is easier for me to get to...
Don't forget: tickets go on sale on 12th August 2009 at 9am and the show takes place on Tuesday Nov 3rd.
PS other efforts to support the National Museum of Computing at Bletchley Park include this amazing URL Shortener called Station X. Keep up the good work, guys!
Monday, 27 July 2009
Gimme Shelter
A friend has been made homeless - as a result of a bout of illness, he got behind with his rent payments. One morning his landlord just turned up with a heavy friend and dumped him and most of his belongings outside without a key.
While this is clearly an illegal eviction (the landlord should have taken the court route), my friend is unable to defend himself because he's still not well and besides, he's sure that no-one will believe his version of events. Well, it is fairly monstrous.
Today he rang Shelter to try to obtain help (having already had a pretty hopeless interview with the emergency housing office in his borough - they took the attitude that since he didn't have a court order evicting him, he must have made himself intentionally homeless). He reports that he got an answerphone message that began "Welcome to Shelter. Please note that we cannot provide accommodation..."
Well, what on Earth is Shelter for then?
I am also disappointed that The Salvation Army was unwilling to help him - I have been supporting it with a regular monthly donation for years as I was under the impression that it provided help to the homeless.
While this is clearly an illegal eviction (the landlord should have taken the court route), my friend is unable to defend himself because he's still not well and besides, he's sure that no-one will believe his version of events. Well, it is fairly monstrous.
Today he rang Shelter to try to obtain help (having already had a pretty hopeless interview with the emergency housing office in his borough - they took the attitude that since he didn't have a court order evicting him, he must have made himself intentionally homeless). He reports that he got an answerphone message that began "Welcome to Shelter. Please note that we cannot provide accommodation..."
Well, what on Earth is Shelter for then?
I am also disappointed that The Salvation Army was unwilling to help him - I have been supporting it with a regular monthly donation for years as I was under the impression that it provided help to the homeless.
Monday, 20 July 2009
Passwords passé?
I've just read a highly amusing and (for Twitter) embarrassing story about the loss of confidential information stored by a Twitter staffer under Google Apps.
The article closes by trotting out the usual advice about making usernames and passwords secure - make them long and cryptic, don't use the same credentials for more than one service, and don't write them down. However, I heard a piece on BBC Radio 4 not long ago in which Damian Grammaticus investigated computer security and hacking. It showed that any Windows password under 14 characters long could be cracked in seconds, regardless of how many punctuation characters and digits it contained. Since we're all forced to register with dozens, if not hundreds of different IT services on the Internet and our employers' networks, it simply isn't possible for standard-issue mortals to memorise that many cryptic usernames and passwords (particularly where IT policy demands that the password be changed regularly).
Common approaches to overcome these wetware limitations include
The article closes by trotting out the usual advice about making usernames and passwords secure - make them long and cryptic, don't use the same credentials for more than one service, and don't write them down. However, I heard a piece on BBC Radio 4 not long ago in which Damian Grammaticus investigated computer security and hacking. It showed that any Windows password under 14 characters long could be cracked in seconds, regardless of how many punctuation characters and digits it contained. Since we're all forced to register with dozens, if not hundreds of different IT services on the Internet and our employers' networks, it simply isn't possible for standard-issue mortals to memorise that many cryptic usernames and passwords (particularly where IT policy demands that the password be changed regularly).
Common approaches to overcome these wetware limitations include
- Writing usernames and passwords down - not recommended because anyone could find them and steal your precious secret information
- Using a standard username and password for many different sites - again not recommended because if a thief finds out one valid combination, (s)he can access all your accounts
- Generating usernames and passwords by means of some function, which you can compute mentally without too much effort and which preferably takes the current month and/or the URL of the service as parameters - this works OK in certain situations, but because the algorithm can't be terribly complicated, someone could reverse-engineer it and have access to all your accounts
- Using a password manager application: something that you install on your laptop (say) and which stores all your usernames and passwords for you, encrypted of course, so that you can only gain access using a master password or even biometric authentication - disadvantages may include the risk of losing the device or the master access key, as well as the inconvenience of having to have the device to hand whenever you need one of your account credentials (not to mention the cost of the password manager itself)
- Trusting an Internet service such as DataInherit to manage the keys for you, which has the advantage that should you die or be incapacitated, a nominated person or persons can automatically be given access to selected accounts in your portfolio - disadvantages include the price and the number of steps you have to go through to retrieve any given username and password
Surely the time is ripe for a security architecture that fully separates authentication from authorisation. Depending on your spending power and level of paranoia, you could procure authentication services from any reputable trust authority of your choosing, which could make use of a single very secure identifier and pass phrase, optionally combined with more stringent authentication factors such as digital certificates, RSA SecurID devices, or even biometrics. The identity thus established would be securely and trustworthily conveyed to whatever service you were trying to access - regardless of whether it is on a company intranet, the public Internet or your ATM network.
Unfortunately the Twitters and Googles of this world, not to mention the myriad online shopping sites, still want you to register with them directly and not with some third-party authentication provider. This is because they believe that there's value in knowing your real world (meatspace) name and address, age, marital status and what have you so that they can push targeted marketing at you. It doesn't seem to bother them that the majority of the data thus gathered is probably untrue, because most Internet users are paranoid about giving away such information.
I want single sign-on to be ubiquitous, effortless, virtually unhackable and foolproof (as well as heritable, as directed by me, when I leave this world, so that my digital assets are not locked away forever). By "ubiquitous", I mean that I should be able to use the same sign-on for my employer's network as for any client's network which wants to authorise me to access some selection of their IT services, for Internet services on which I register and preferably at the bank's ATM too. By "effortless", I mean that authenticating myself to all these services is necessary only once per computer per day and ideally doesn't require me to memorise anything, or at most one thing. A physical token in addition, or a biometric, would be acceptable.
The theoretical foundations already exist, underpinning such standards as Kerberos and WS-Trust. But to make it work in the real world of competing and highly disparate IT services, the community of service providers would need to discover some kind of shared interest in implementing it as standard. A grand computing challenge for the new millennium, perhaps?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
